<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waiting to Wean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/2008/12/waiting-to-wean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/2008/12/waiting-to-wean/</link>
	<description>The good, the bad and the guilt - through motherhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/2008/12/waiting-to-wean/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/?p=51#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Gala - so many things to address.

For a start, any sorts of solids in a bottle is widely acknowledged as a choking hazard and is potentially very dangerous.

Secondly, how to do we know all those babies developed normally.  With all the food intolerances and bowel conditions around at the moment, how do we know that early weaning has not contributed to all these?  It is also about a statistical likelihood - early weaning does not mean that things will happen to a particular child, but it makes it more likely that they will, based on current evidence.

As I already said, there are, clearly, exceptions to everything and it is my understanding that solid foods, given early under the guidance of a paediatrician can help a baby with severe reflux.  However, as I understand it, the diet will be carefully controlled and it is considered that the risks are outweighed by the benefits.

And just  because there is a trial to investigate something, does not mean that it will be proven to be the case - we&#039;ll have to wait and see on that one, and it will take many years.  I&#039;d like to see your HV&#039;s evidence about changes of thought in the WHO too.

As for the guidelines / rules, the SIDS guidelines (atlhough admittedly the co-sleeping guidelines are not based on the available research at the moment) say that you shouldn&#039;t put a baby to sleep on their front.  Since this advice was widely followed, SIDS (cot death) rates have dropped 80%.  But should a mother ignore that bit of advice just so they can get a bit more sleep.

If you think this was a judgemental post, then I guess you have your own issues about weaning to address, because with the exception of the last paragraph, I was calmly and clearly outlining some of the reasoning behind the guidelines, which I have found most people have not been told.

I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t trot out the &quot;happy mum, happy baby&quot; line.  Parenting is hard, but we chose to become parents and that means putting the needs of our children before our own at times.  After all, they are so often not capable of doing that for themselves.  I will not risk the future health of my child so that I can get a bit more sleep, and if others decide that, then that is their choice.  I hope for their child&#039;s sake that they can look at their child when it is grown and not see an adult with allergy or digestive issues and wonder if that extra sleep might have come at too high a price.

And have you ever watched a video of a tiny baby being fed.  The constant scraping of food and putting it back in their mouths, past their tongue which is still trying to push the food out of their mouths?  That means that they are physically not ready for it.  It was those situations that I specifically judged.  How can they be mothering instincts if those &#039;instincts&#039; are overriding those of your baby?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gala &#8211; so many things to address.</p>
<p>For a start, any sorts of solids in a bottle is widely acknowledged as a choking hazard and is potentially very dangerous.</p>
<p>Secondly, how to do we know all those babies developed normally.  With all the food intolerances and bowel conditions around at the moment, how do we know that early weaning has not contributed to all these?  It is also about a statistical likelihood &#8211; early weaning does not mean that things will happen to a particular child, but it makes it more likely that they will, based on current evidence.</p>
<p>As I already said, there are, clearly, exceptions to everything and it is my understanding that solid foods, given early under the guidance of a paediatrician can help a baby with severe reflux.  However, as I understand it, the diet will be carefully controlled and it is considered that the risks are outweighed by the benefits.</p>
<p>And just  because there is a trial to investigate something, does not mean that it will be proven to be the case &#8211; we&#8217;ll have to wait and see on that one, and it will take many years.  I&#8217;d like to see your HV&#8217;s evidence about changes of thought in the WHO too.</p>
<p>As for the guidelines / rules, the SIDS guidelines (atlhough admittedly the co-sleeping guidelines are not based on the available research at the moment) say that you shouldn&#8217;t put a baby to sleep on their front.  Since this advice was widely followed, SIDS (cot death) rates have dropped 80%.  But should a mother ignore that bit of advice just so they can get a bit more sleep.</p>
<p>If you think this was a judgemental post, then I guess you have your own issues about weaning to address, because with the exception of the last paragraph, I was calmly and clearly outlining some of the reasoning behind the guidelines, which I have found most people have not been told.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t trot out the &#8220;happy mum, happy baby&#8221; line.  Parenting is hard, but we chose to become parents and that means putting the needs of our children before our own at times.  After all, they are so often not capable of doing that for themselves.  I will not risk the future health of my child so that I can get a bit more sleep, and if others decide that, then that is their choice.  I hope for their child&#8217;s sake that they can look at their child when it is grown and not see an adult with allergy or digestive issues and wonder if that extra sleep might have come at too high a price.</p>
<p>And have you ever watched a video of a tiny baby being fed.  The constant scraping of food and putting it back in their mouths, past their tongue which is still trying to push the food out of their mouths?  That means that they are physically not ready for it.  It was those situations that I specifically judged.  How can they be mothering instincts if those &#8216;instincts&#8217; are overriding those of your baby?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gala</title>
		<link>http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/2008/12/waiting-to-wean/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Gala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/?p=51#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Back in the seventies, not that i was around then, baby cereal or rusks were given all the time to babies in their bottles and they still grew and developed normally. there is too much puritanical opinion out there and there is too much pressure now to follow guidelines and quite frankly, they are just that - guidelines. my health visitor recently advised me that the world health organization is beginning to back track on weaning at the six month mark. my son was recently invited to take part in government funded research to see if weaning certain foods early can decrease the chance of allergies developing. so..... as mothers, you do what works, for your child and for you. and children, like adults, need undisturbed sleep, as well as nutrition. so if a mother chooses to put baby rice in the bottle to get some extra sleep, so she can otherwise function to be able to care for her child, i don&#039;t see the harm. and also, perhaps this decreases the chance of a future allergy/intolerance to gluten developing, for instance. who&#039;s to say? does this still make her a bad mother? not that i practice this. i do however have a baby who suffers from reflux so much so that he often refuses to feed well whilst awake. i feed him a couple of times a day whilst asleep. (i am considering early weaning) does this make me a bad mum too? some would say i am force feeding...i am in effect. either that or he won&#039;t grow, becomes constipated and then will not feed at all. as i said you do what works! parenting is hard enough without this too quick to judge attitude which i see displayed on this page! you just make it harder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the seventies, not that i was around then, baby cereal or rusks were given all the time to babies in their bottles and they still grew and developed normally. there is too much puritanical opinion out there and there is too much pressure now to follow guidelines and quite frankly, they are just that &#8211; guidelines. my health visitor recently advised me that the world health organization is beginning to back track on weaning at the six month mark. my son was recently invited to take part in government funded research to see if weaning certain foods early can decrease the chance of allergies developing. so&#8230;.. as mothers, you do what works, for your child and for you. and children, like adults, need undisturbed sleep, as well as nutrition. so if a mother chooses to put baby rice in the bottle to get some extra sleep, so she can otherwise function to be able to care for her child, i don&#8217;t see the harm. and also, perhaps this decreases the chance of a future allergy/intolerance to gluten developing, for instance. who&#8217;s to say? does this still make her a bad mother? not that i practice this. i do however have a baby who suffers from reflux so much so that he often refuses to feed well whilst awake. i feed him a couple of times a day whilst asleep. (i am considering early weaning) does this make me a bad mum too? some would say i am force feeding&#8230;i am in effect. either that or he won&#8217;t grow, becomes constipated and then will not feed at all. as i said you do what works! parenting is hard enough without this too quick to judge attitude which i see displayed on this page! you just make it harder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/2008/12/waiting-to-wean/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muddlingthroughmotherhood.co.uk/?p=51#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you! REALLY don&#039;t get this rush to wean at all. My daughter is almost 20 weeks and we&#039;re both very happy breast and occasionally bottle feeding. As our health worker said, an early wean could undo all the benfits of breastfeeding and I&#039;m not wanting to risk her health at all. Not particularly interested in weaning until I have to - why is everyone so mad keen for it anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you! REALLY don&#8217;t get this rush to wean at all. My daughter is almost 20 weeks and we&#8217;re both very happy breast and occasionally bottle feeding. As our health worker said, an early wean could undo all the benfits of breastfeeding and I&#8217;m not wanting to risk her health at all. Not particularly interested in weaning until I have to &#8211; why is everyone so mad keen for it anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
